Above the Law posted
this story about a disabled student failing the WV bar. He sued and demanded accommodations. This reminded me of the law student that "
fought his way into law school." Bernstein fought his way into law school, arguing that the LSAT test at
Northwestern University violated his rights as a blind person because the test
wasn't offered in Braille. He won and was admitted to the school based on his
academic achievement, as an honors graduate from the University of Michigan.
Where should the line be drawn? One commenter on
ATL questioned how billing would work for the disabled student who "has severe deficits in processing speed, cognitive fluency and rapid naming."
As a client, would you want this attorney working on your case? I don't know. This is a tough issue. There is definitely grumbling when a few students get an extra hour on a difficult timed exam in law school. Should these 'disabled' students get extra time or should all the students in the class face the same time limit?
*Bernstein seems to be doing well. He teaches a political science class at U. of Michigan and works for his family's law firm. He
also sued U. of Michigan on behalf the Michigan Paralyzed Veterans of America.